I have a Grand Unified Theory of Writing Problems.

It explains most problems I’ve heard people report.

The theory is this: there are discrete stages to the writing process, and most if not all problems can usefully be explained by conflating stages, or proceeding out of order.

When I write a blog post on tasshin.com, here are the stages in my writing process:

  1. Idea
  2. Gathering Notes / Questions / Theses
  3. Outlining
  4. Drafting
  5. Soliciting Content Feedback
  6. Revising
  7. Soliciting Editing Feedback
  8. Final Polishing
  9. Publishing
  10. Distributing

Each of those steps has discrete sub-steps.

If I proceed through all these stages, in this order, then I can reliably produce excellent content that I’m proud of.

Trying to draft before U’ve had an idea, gathered your notes, or made an outline is called “staring at a blank page.” No wonder this is hard!

Trying to revise without having received feedback on the content is hard.

U might need different stages.

I recently saw an excellent alternative stage model, specifically for fiction: Matt Bell’s three stage model, covered in his book Refuse to be Done.

In any case, I’ve found considering what stages I tend to go through with my writing process valuable, and U might, too.